First of all, there is no award for starting wars. Even badly planned and
illegal ones.
Imagine that.
Also, there seems to be an absence of recognition for destroying a fabled American City.
Must be an oversight by the Nobel Committee.
Since Bush can not articulate himself verbally, it bodes badly for the written word.
Bu bye literature prize.
And don't expect the Pulitzer Committee to be knocking on your door.
Let's see, the only payoff for stealing Presidential elections is siphoning off public monies for friends and cronies.
No statues or worldwide acclaim.
Wait, George, you must have done something to receive some sort of prize.
But you couldn't even win national elections. Either time.
Again, bad omen.
How about a prize for blocking science and medicine?
But what group would be ridiculous enough to present it?
Liberty University? Former Senator Santorum doing the honors?
C'mon George, we need to get you a prize that wasn't stolen, broken or destroyed.
Maybe if the criteria for economics could be stretched to include capsizing the fiscal health of America.
But you didn't work alone.
Bush built on the policies of Reagan, his father, and some of Bill Clinton's decisions.
Still it is an omission not to award leaders for total fiscal annihilation.
The conservatives do nothings ridiculed Al Gore for winning the Nobel Peace Prize.
The disdain came from a party that has (and continues) advocated wrong policies for decades and a talk show clown who only qualifies to be cited in the Guinness Book of Records.
For taking the most prescription pills and surviving. Plus, not going to jail.
The only recognition that George W. Bush will receive is from historians who will rank him as the worst President of the United States thus far.
And by citizens who curse his name.
Indict him aleady.